Conventions’ Revenge: Davidson, Derangement, and Dormativity
نویسندگان
چکیده
Davidson advocates a radical and powerful form of anti-conventionalism, on which the scope of a semantic theory is restricted to the most local of contexts: a particular utterance by a particular speaker. I argue that this hyper-localism undercuts the explanatory grounds for his assumption that semantic meaning is systematic, which is central, among other things, to his holism. More importantly, it threatens to undercut the distinction between word meaning and speaker’s meaning, which he takes to be essential to semantics. I argue that a moderate form of conventionalism can restore systematicity and the word/speaker distinction while accommodating Davidson’s insights about the complexities and contextual variability of language use.
منابع مشابه
A Defense of Derangement
according to B&R, if Davidson had established his "no language" thesis, he would thereby have provided a decisive reason for abandoning the project he has long advocated--viz., that of trying to provide theories of meaning for natural languages by providing recursive theories of truth for such languages. For he would have shown that there are no languages to provide truth (or meaning) theories ...
متن کاملMetaphor and Varieties of Meaning
In discussions of metaphor, Davidson is (in)famous for claiming that metaphorical utterances lack any distinctive, nonliteral meaning. But there is much less agreement about just what he means by this. In this article, I explicate this claim as it occurs in “What Metaphors Mean” (1978) and relate it to his refl ections on language in “A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs” (1986), leaving the project ...
متن کاملRevanchist Behaviors in an Academic Style: A Qualitative Study to Analyze Academics’ Revenge
This study focuses on examining the counterproductive behaviors of academics, who have a lesser likelihood to show revanchist acts on account of the characteristics of their professional group, defining the purposes, means, and reasons of revenge, and determining the results of revanchist behaviors. To this end, we conducted a qualitative study on the academics who were working at Turkish state...
متن کاملCustom Calling Conventions in a Portable Assembly Language
Calling conventions are so difficult to implement and maintain that people rarely experiment with alternatives. The primary sources of difficulty appear to be parameter passing and stack-frame layout. To implement parameter passing, we use the automata developed by Bailey and Davidson, but we have developed a new specification language that is implementable directly in the compiler. To implemen...
متن کامل